Elements
1. Proximity, close and direct relationship
2. Foreseeability of harm likely to cause
3. Reasonable/fair/just to impose duty on Defendant
Please refer to the case of:
a. Donoghue v Stevenson
b. Murphy v Brentwood Dist Council
Defendant does not owe duty
a. Governor of the Peabody Donation Fund Ltd v Sir Lindsay
b. Dorset Yatch Co. Ltd v Home Office
Policy Reason
Please refer to the case of:
1. Rondel v Worsley
2. Hill v The Chief Constable West Yorkshire
Other Points to Note
1. Omission as oppose to act
2. Duty to particular person
1. Proximity, close and direct relationship
2. Foreseeability of harm likely to cause
3. Reasonable/fair/just to impose duty on Defendant
Please refer to the case of:
a. Donoghue v Stevenson
b. Murphy v Brentwood Dist Council
Defendant does not owe duty
a. Governor of the Peabody Donation Fund Ltd v Sir Lindsay
b. Dorset Yatch Co. Ltd v Home Office
Policy Reason
Please refer to the case of:
1. Rondel v Worsley
2. Hill v The Chief Constable West Yorkshire
Other Points to Note
1. Omission as oppose to act
2. Duty to particular person
